Standard for Multioutlet Assemblies

Logo
Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (UL)
Standards Development Organisation:
Working Program:
Designation Number:
UL 111
Status:
NOI withdrawn
SDO Comment Period Start Date:
SDO Comment Period End Date:
Posted On:

Scope:

Scope

Note: NOI  for UL 111 was withdrawn on 2018-06-19 as requested by the responsible SDO.

Note: Scope updated 2018-03-20 as per a request from the responsible SDO.

1.1 These requirements cover Multioutlet Assemblies and factory assembled wiring kits for installation in Multioutlet Assemblies. Multioutlet Assemblies consist of a raceway, multiple outlet wiring devices that provide power for connection of utilization equipment. Multioutlet Assemblies are intended for use in dry locations, other than hazardous (classified) in accordance with the Canadian Electrical Code, Part I, Safety Standard for Electrical Installations, CSA-C22.1 for Canada and the National Electrical Code®, NFPA 70®a. for the United States. Multioutlet Assemblies are intended to be connected to branch circuits operating at potentials not exceeding 1000 volts between conductors, frequencies between 50 - 400 Hz and DC (Direct Current) circuits.

a NFPA 70®, National Electrical Code and NEC® are registered trademarks of the National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA.

1.2 Multioutlet Assemblies are intended to be permanently wired. In Canada Multioutlet Assemblies installed as a “pole-type” assemblages are permitted to be installed with cord and plug connection in accordance with Rule 12-010 of the Canadian Electrical Code, Part I, Safety Standard for Electrical Installations, CSA-C22.1.

1.3 Except as noted in 1.2, general purpose cord and plug connected outlet assemblies are covered by the following standards:

     a) Cord reels and multi-outlet assemblies, CSA-C22.2 No. 308 for Canada;

     b) The Standard for Relocatable Power Taps, UL 1363, for the United States; or

     c) The Standard for Furniture Power Distribution Units, UL 962A, for the United States.

1.4 Multioutlet Assemblies may be provided with:

     a) Fuses or other supplementary overcurrent protection;

     b) Switches;

     c) Suppression components;

     d) EMI filters;

     e) LED drivers;

     f) Luminaires;

     g) Ballasts;

     h) Motors;

     i) Control circuits;

     j) Transformers;

     k) Relays;

     l) Indicator lights; and

     m) Other similar equipment.

1.5 A Multioutlet Assembly may be provided with channels for additional power circuits, control circuits, power limited circuits and communication circuit wiring for audio, video and data.

1.6 These requirements do not cover surface metal raceways or surface nonmetallic raceways. Surface raceways are evaluated to the following Standards:

     a) Surface raceway systems, CSA-C22.2 No. 62 for Canada;

     b) Surface Metal Raceways and Fittings, UL 5 for the United States;

     c) Nonmetallic Surface Raceways and Fittings, CSA-C22.2 No. 62.1 for Canada; and

     d) Nonmetallic Surface Raceways and Fittings, UL 5A for the United States

1.7 For the United States this standard does not cover assemblies that only incorporate receptacles of the GFCI type. These assemblies are covered by the Standard for Ground-fault Circuit-Interrupters, UL 943.

1.8 This Standard contains the following supplements:

     a) Supplement SA – Modular Factory-Wired Floor-Mounted Multioutlet Assemblies

     b) Supplement SB – Motor-Operated Multioutlet Assemblies

Project need:

Project Need
Industry that serves the entire North American market requested that UL develop a consolidated standard to address this class of products, which are currently inadequately treated by multiple standards in differing ways. Raceway standards do not adequately address the constructions that are being designed; the CEC and NEC do not address the installation of conductors in raceways that also contain energy consumption components such as LED drivers, USB chargers and other utilization equipment. Industry requested that this standard be created for the class of products to ensure all products within the class are addressed in a similar manner (the current approach creates manufacturing issues for some of the products within the class because updates to the different standards are more difficult to maintain and keep current when treated by different committees and different standards) this could lead to different certification requirements for the variety of products within the class, creating manufacturing difficulties as the technology changes and evolves over time; a consolidated approach ensures consistent requirements for the different variety of products covered by the class of products. Industry requested that this standard be harmonized for both Canada and the US as they produce products for both markets; a single harmonized standard for both markets is preferred as it would: a) Reduce costs to produce for both markets; b) Ensure market access for these products to Canada (otherwise industry may only produce the products for the US market only); and c) Create a predictable and simplified standard that will be maintained and continue to be harmonized for this class of products moving forward for both markets creating predictability from the manufacturing perspective.                          

Note: The information provided above was obtained by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) and is provided as part of a centralized, transparent notification system for new standards development. The system allows SCC-accredited Standards Development Organizations (SDOs), and members of the public, to be informed of new work in Canadian standards development, and allows SCC-accredited SDOs to identify and resolve potential duplication of standards and effort.

Individual SDOs are responsible for the content and accuracy of the information presented here. The text is presented in the language in which it was provided to SCC.