Antifreeze Solutions for Use in Fire Sprinkler Systems

Logo
Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (UL)
Standards Development Organisation:
Working Program:
Designation Number:
ANSI/CAN/UL 2901
Standard Type:
National Standard of Canada - Domestic
Standard Development Activity:
Amendment Revision
ICS code(s):
13.220.20
Status:
Proceeding to development
SDO Comment Period Start Date:
SDO Comment Period End Date:
Posted On:

Scope:

Scope

1.1 This standard covers requirements for the performance of antifreeze solutions for fire sprinkler systems. 1.2 These solutions are intended for use in wet pipe sprinkler systems subject to freezing for installation in accordance with the manufacturer’s design and installation instructions, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in One- and Two-Family Dwellings and Manufactured Homes, NFPA 13D, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in Low-Rise Residential Occupancies, NFPA 13R, and the Standard for Installation of Automatic Sprinkler Systems, NFPA 13; and inspected, tested and maintained in accordance with the Standard for Inspection, Testing and Maintenance of Water Based Fire Protection Systems, NFPA 25. 1.3 This standard does not contain requirements to evaluate the risk associated with products of combustion of antifreeze solutions.

Project need:

Project Need
This revision modifies the text in Section 15.2 to reference the ¾ inch size as representative for assessing antifreeze for compatibility with thermoplastic sprinkler pipe. The current text in UL 1821 requires the largest and smallest size of pipe to be tested for the Long-Term Hydrostatic Pressure Test. This is appropriate when evaluating the pipe and material itself for hydrostatic strength with water, however, it is not necessary to test the largest size when evaluating the pipe and material for compatibility with antifreeze. The representative size chosen of ¾ inch pipe would have a lesser wall thickness than the larger sizes of CPVC and PEX, and thus be more susceptible to showing degradation from incompatible materials. Therefore, it is unnecessary to also test the largest size with thicker walls since compatibility issues would be first exhibited with the smaller representative size of ¾ inch. The concept of using smaller size pipe as representative of larger size pipe has also been discussed and confirmed with the UL 1821B, Evaluating Compatibility of Products with CPVC Piping, Standards Technical Panel Task Group. The task group agreed that for pipe with the same ratings and SDR, a thinner wall pipe can be representative of thicker wall pipe for compatibility assessments.

Note: The information provided above was obtained by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) and is provided as part of a centralized, transparent notification system for new standards development. The system allows SCC-accredited Standards Development Organizations (SDOs), and members of the public, to be informed of new work in Canadian standards development, and allows SCC-accredited SDOs to identify and resolve potential duplication of standards and effort.

Individual SDOs are responsible for the content and accuracy of the information presented here. The text is presented in the language in which it was provided to SCC.