Standard Test Method for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Polyurethane Foam

Logo
ULC Standards Logo
Standards Development Organisation:
Contact Information:
Working Program:
Designation Number:
CAN/ULC-S774
Standard Type:
National Standard of Canada - Domestic
Standard Development Activity:
Amendment Revision
ICS code(s):
19.040; 91.120.10
Status:
Open for SDO comment
SDO Comment Period Start Date:
SDO Comment Period End Date:
Posted On:

Scope:

Scope

1  Scope

1.1  This Standard has been developed for the assessment of volatile organic compound emissions from polyurethane foam materials used in residential and nonresidential occupancies. It outlines a test procedure for the determination of volatile organic compounds from the specimen and explains why certain test conditions have been selected.

1.2  This laboratory test method is based on ASTM D5116 and ASTM D8142, which describes a procedure using small-scale environmental chambers to determine volatile organic compound emissions from a variety of materials including Spray Polyurethane Foam (SPF) Insulation.

1.3  The chamber methodology only presents a simple picture of the complex nature and interactions of emissions that may exist in home and work environments. However, data from the chamber procedure is useful for identifying potential sources of chemicals that may adversely affect the health of the occupants. Therefore, the results from these tests cannot fully represent "real life" conditions and they will err on the side of conservatism.

1.4  The test method specifies recommended procedures for the use of test chambers to evaluate emissions from the material at a point in time following its installation. The test method contains the following:

a) A dynamic chamber procedure for characterizing the rate of volatile organic compound emissions from the material; and

b) A methodology for calculating the estimated indoor air concentrations of volatile organic compounds based on the results of dynamic chamber testing.

1.5  The dynamic chamber procedure measures the typical VOC emission profile of the material commencing 24 h after installation and continuing for 30 d thereafter.

1.6  The results of the dynamic chamber procedure are used to calculate indoor air VOC concentration profiles and to determine the acceptability of the material for retrofit use.

1.7  The dynamic chamber procedure is a more complex evaluation of the material when the normal 30 d minimum time to occupancy associated with new construction is not provided (e.g. occupied buildings).

1.8  In these special cases (e.g. occupied buildings), the application and installation standard will provide the requirements for isolation and ventilation, if necessary. The test results of the dynamic chamber procedure will determine the length of time that these requirements are necessary.

1.9  The methodology for assessing the acceptability of the material utilizes comparison of the estimated indoor air concentration of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with permissible concentrations published by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Health Canada and/or a Human Health Risk Assessment Report (HHRA) by a licensed Toxicologist.

1.10  This test method can also be used to measure the emissions from SPF insulation samples that are collected from building sites where the insulation has already been applied. Potential uses of such measurements include investigations of odor complaints after product application. However, the specific details of odor investigations and other indoor air quality (IAQ) investigations are outside of the scope of this test method.

Project need:

Project Need

ULC Standards shall be written to provide clear direction to the users of the standard and promote consistent application of requirements in the standard. Mandatory writing style is preferred in the development and revision of all standards because the use of non-mandatory language does not provide specific direction to users of the standard. Non-mandatory language can lead to requirements that are unclear and have varying interpretations. 

The term ‘should’ is used numerous times in ULC 774. I propose that the standard be revised to use mandatory language (‘shall’). The word "shall" is to be used only for required product or system attributes in a standard.

Note: The information provided above was obtained by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) and is provided as part of a centralized, transparent notification system for new standards development. The system allows SCC-accredited Standards Development Organizations (SDOs), and members of the public, to be informed of new work in Canadian standards development, and allows SCC-accredited SDOs to identify and resolve potential duplication of standards and effort.

Individual SDOs are responsible for the content and accuracy of the information presented here. The text is presented in the language in which it was provided to SCC.