Medical devices – Part 1 Application of usability engineering to medical devices

Designation Number:
IEC 62366-1
Standard Type:
National Standard of Canada - Adoption of International Standard
Standard Development Activity:
New Edition
ICS code(s):
11.040
Status:
Proceeding to development
SDO Comment Period Start Date:
SDO Comment Period End Date:
Posted On:

Scope:

Scope

1 * Scope

This part of IEC 62366 specifies a PROCESS for a MANUFACTURER to analyse, specify, develop

and evaluate the USABILITY of a MEDICAL DEVICE as it relates to SAFETY. This USABILITY

ENGINEERING (HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING) PROCESS permits the MANUFACTURER to assess

and mitigate RISKS associated with CORRECT USE and USE ERRORS, i.e., NORMAL USE. It can be

used to identify but does not assess or mitigate RISKS associated with ABNORMAL USE.

 

NOTE 1 SAFETY is freedom from unacceptable RISK. Unacceptable RISK can arise from USE ERROR, which can lead

to exposure to direct physical HAZARDS or loss or degradation of clinical functionality.

 

NOTE 2 Guidance on the application of USABILITY ENGINEERING to MEDICAL DEVICES is available in IEC 62366-22,

which addresses not only SAFETY but also aspects of USABILITY not related to SAFETY.

 

If the USABILITY ENGINEERING PROCESS detailed in this International Standard has been

complied with, then the USABILITY of a MEDICAL DEVICE as it relates to SAFETY is presumed to be

acceptable, unless there is OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE to the contrary.

 

NOTE 3 Such OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE can subsequently originate from POST-PRODUCTION surveillance.

Project need:

Project Need
To maintain alignment with international requirements (IEC 62366-1 2015+AMD1 2020 CSV (Ed 1.1)).

Note: The information provided above was obtained by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) and is provided as part of a centralized, transparent notification system for new standards development. The system allows SCC-accredited Standards Development Organizations (SDOs), and members of the public, to be informed of new work in Canadian standards development, and allows SCC-accredited SDOs to identify and resolve potential duplication of standards and effort.

Individual SDOs are responsible for the content and accuracy of the information presented here. The text is presented in the language in which it was provided to SCC.