Information technology — Metamodel framework for interoperability (MFI) — Part 5: Metamodel for process model registration

Designation Number:
CAN/CSA-ISO/IEC 19763-5:16
Standard Type:
National Standard of Canada - Adoption of International Standard
Standard Development Activity:
Reaffirmation
ICS code(s):
35.040
Status:
Proceeding to development
SDO Comment Period Start Date:
SDO Comment Period End Date:
Posted On:

Scope:

The primary purpose of the multipart standard ISO/IEC 19763 is to specify a metamodel framework for interoperability. 

This part of ISO/IEC 19763 specifies the metamodel that describes a facility to register administrative information and selected metadata about process models. The metamodel specified in this part of ISO/IEC 19763 is intended to promote semantic discovery and reuse of process models within/across process model repositories. For this purpose, it provides selected metadata and common semantics of process models created with a specific process modelling language, including Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN)[1], UML (Unified Modelling Language) Activity Diagram[5] and EPC (Event-driven Process Chain)[7], etc. The metamodel can help discovery of the function and composition of a process, and promote reuse of its components at different levels of granularity. 

The following are outside the scope of this part of ISO/IEC 19763: 

  • details related to modelling notations or descriptive languages of process models; 
  • runtime environments or implementation platforms for executing processes.

Project need:

To review the Standard within the required 5 year period.

Note: The information provided above was obtained by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) and is provided as part of a centralized, transparent notification system for new standards development. The system allows SCC-accredited Standards Development Organizations (SDOs), and members of the public, to be informed of new work in Canadian standards development, and allows SCC-accredited SDOs to identify and resolve potential duplication of standards and effort.

Individual SDOs are responsible for the content and accuracy of the information presented here. The text is presented in the language in which it was provided to SCC.