Series of standards supporting the implementation of online electoral voting in Canada.
Designation Number:
CAN-CIOSC 111-x
Standard Type:
National Standard of Canada - Domestic
Standard Development Activity:
New Standard
ICS code(s):
35.020
Status:
Proceeding to development
SDO Comment Period Start Date:
SDO Comment Period End Date:
Posted On:
Scope:
Scope
Note: CIO Strategy Council announced an organizational name change to the Digital Governance Council (DGC), effective January 30, 2023 and the creation of a new standards development division, Digital Governance Standards Institute (DGSI).
This proposed series of standards aims to specify minimum technical requirements for online electoral voting in Canada at the municipal, provincial and federal level.
Considerations are given to:
• Thresholds to measure the security of online voting systems, including the security and privacy of voting data both in transit and in storage across the many devices and entities involved in the election (including voters, third party providers, vendors and election officials);
• Documentation and processes for voter identity and authentication;
• Documentation and processes for verification requirements;
• Minimum requirements for the provisioning of network and computational resources and capacity;
• Logic/accuracy discovery, documentation and processes of the testing and auditability of systems, including clear parameters regarding when they must be audited and by whom, and how much detail of the system must be made public;
• Documentation and processes regarding access to the voting systems and voter and election information. This includes parameters regarding who has access to different parts of the system (e.g. government officials and bodies) and control over making system changes as well as defining the role of vendors and their level of access to voter and ballot information;
• Protocols and processes to protect the secrecy of the vote to ensure that cast votes cannot be traced back to individual voters, defining who has privileged access to what information and what technical privacy guarantees are required;
• Documentation and processes surrounding ballot design, including measures for ensuring that ballots display consistently across operating systems, devices, and browsers;
• Clear and defined documentation of accessibility requirements to ensure that all voters are able to cast a vote using the online voting technology;
• Establishing procedures to clarify the role of candidates and scrutineers in the online voting process, including when and how the system is demonstrated to them and their role in the tabulation and verification of results. As part of the technical solution the practice of scrutineering must have meaning and soundness.
Project need:
Project Need
Canada currently leads the world in online voting utilization (e.g., number of voters using the technology). It is also the only country where elections are run completely online remotely. Across Canada, more than 240 municipalities and 90 First Nations have deployed online voting in binding elections to millions of electors. In many cases (about 70 percent of municipalities that use online voting), paper voting has been eliminated and electronic ballots, either online or by telephone, are the only option for voters. In Ontario specifically, 177 municipalities used online voting in the 2018 municipal elections and it is likely many more will adopt the technology in the months to come given pressures to offer remote voting since the onset of the coronavirus pandemic. However, despite this world leading uptake of online voting technology there are currently no common standards or guidelines to shepherd the use of this technology in Canada.
Note: The information provided above was obtained by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) and is provided as part of a centralized, transparent notification system for new standards development. The system allows SCC-accredited Standards Development Organizations (SDOs), and members of the public, to be informed of new work in Canadian standards development, and allows SCC-accredited SDOs to identify and resolve potential duplication of standards and effort.
Individual SDOs are responsible for the content and accuracy of the information presented here. The text is presented in the language in which it was provided to SCC.